Use-case guide

Best local LLMs for chat in 2026

Best local chat models for private assistants, writing, brainstorming and everyday AI use on Mac or PC. Ranked from the LocalClaw model database with RAM requirements, quantization and links to static model pages.

Matching models
155
Best pick
Bonsai 27B
Primary signal
chat, general
SEO query
best local LLM for chat

Quick answer

For chat, start with Bonsai 27B if your hardware fits it. If not, choose the highest-ranked model that fits your RAM tier and preferred quantization.

Top local models for chat

#1

Bonsai 27B

27.3B (ternary / 1-bit) · 16GB RAM · Ternary Q2_0_g128 · Q:8 C:9 R:9 S:9

PrismML low-bit model derived from Qwen 3.6 27B. Official Apache 2.0 ternary (7.2GB deployed) and 1-bit (3.9GB) builds retain multimodal, reasoning and agentic capabilities through custom GGUF and MLX runtimes.

chatcodereasoningvisionagenticmultimodal
#2

Qwen 3 Next (80B/3B MoE)

80B (3B active) · 64GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:9 C:9 R:9 S:8

Alibaba's next-gen MoE with hybrid-gated DeltaNet attention. Only 3B active params — runs at dense 7B speed with 70B quality. 256K native context (extensible to 1M). Hybrid thinking mode. Apache 2.0.

chatcodereasoningpowerquality
#3

Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B

35B (3B active, MoE) · 32GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:9 C:10 R:9 S:7

Qwen Team open-weight MoE for agentic coding and multimodal work. 35B total / 3B active, 262K native context, Apache 2.0, and strong GGUF availability through Unsloth and LM Studio-compatible artifacts.

chatcodereasoningvisionagenticpower
#4

Ling-2.6-flash (104B MoE)

104B (7.4B active) · 80GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:9 C:9 R:8 S:8

InclusionAI's MIT-licensed instruct MoE optimized for fast agent workloads. 104B total parameters, only 7.4B active, hybrid linear attention, 262K context and strong tool-use / multi-step execution with high token efficiency.

chatcodereasoningspeedquality
#5

LFM2.5-8B-A1B

8.3B (1.5B active) · 8GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:8 C:8 R:8 S:9

Liquid AI hybrid model built for on-device assistants. 8.3B total / 1.5B active, 128K context, tool use, GGUF, ONNX, MLX, llama.cpp and LM Studio support. Open-weight under LFM 1.0.

chatcodereasoningspeedstandardgeneral
#6

Qwen 3.5 MoE (122B/10B active)

122B (10B active) · 80GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:9 R:10 S:4

Large MoE model with only 10B active params. 60% cheaper to run than Qwen3-Max. 256K context. Top-tier reasoning, coding and multilingual. Hybrid think/non-think. Apache 2.0.

chatcodereasoningqualitypower
#7

Gemma 4 26B A4B

26B (A4B active) · 24GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:9 C:8 R:9 S:7

Gemma 4 MoE flagship-for-workstations: 26B total with ~4B active parameters. 256K context and excellent quality-per-watt for local inference. Apache 2.0.

chatcodereasoningpowermultimodalgeneral
#8

GLM 4.5 Air (MoE)

106B (14B active, MoE) · 16GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:9 C:9 R:9 S:7

Zhipu AI's efficient MoE powerhouse. 106B total parameters, only 14B active at inference — dense-model speed with much larger model quality. Clearly the best in the 16–24GB RAM range. Outperforms Llama 3.3 70B. Apache 2.0.

chatcodepowerqualitygeneral
#9

Kimi K2 Instruct (1T MoE)

1T (32B active, 384 experts) · 1024GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:10 R:10 S:3

Moonshot AI trillion-parameter MoE flagship. 32B active params per token with 384 experts. Matches or beats GPT-4 Turbo on MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEval. Agentic & tool-use specialist. Server-grade only. Modified MIT.

chatcodereasoningqualitygeneral
#10

MiniMax M3 (428B/23B active)

428B (23B active) · 2048GB RAM · BF16 / custom runtime · Q:10 C:10 R:10 S:3

MiniMax native multimodal MoE with 1M context and MiniMax Sparse Attention. Around 428B parameters with 23B active. Built for long-context coding, cowork and agentic workflows, with local deployment via SGLang, vLLM or Transformers. Server-grade only.

chatcodereasoningagenticlong-contextmultimodal
#11

Granite 4.1 (8B)

8B · 8GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:8 C:8 R:8 S:8

IBM Granite 4.1 long-context instruct model. Apache 2.0, 131K context, tool calling, RAG, code tasks, multilingual dialog and business assistant workflows on normal 8-16 GB machines.

chatcodereasoningstandardgeneral
#12

Qwen 3.5 MoE (35B/3B active)

35B (3B active) · 24GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:8 C:9 R:8 S:9

MoE gem — only 3B params active at inference. 19x faster than Qwen3-Max at 256K context. Best quality-per-watt of the series. Hybrid thinking mode. Runs on Mac Studio 32GB. Agentic coding standout.

chatcodereasoningpowerspeed
#13

GLM 4.6 Air (12B)

12B · 12GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:8 C:8 R:8 S:8

Zhipu AI lightweight flagship. Strong bilingual CN/EN with hybrid thinking mode, 200K context and tool calling. Apache 2.0 — excellent alternative to Qwen 3.5 9B on modest GPUs.

chatcodereasoningstandardgeneral
#14

Qwen 3.6 (27B)

27B · 32GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:9 C:9 R:10 S:5

Qwen 3.6 flagship dense model. Hybrid thinking mode with /think toggle for deep chain-of-thought reasoning. 128K context, 29+ languages. Significantly outperforms Qwen3.5-27B on reasoning, coding & math. Apache 2.0.

chatcodereasoningpowerquality
#15

Qwen 3 (14B)

14B · 16GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:9 C:9 R:9 S:6

The sweet spot. Incredible reasoning, coding and chat quality. The best model you can run on 16GB.

chatcodereasoningpowergeneral
#16

Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano (4B)

4B · 6GB RAM · Q5_K_M · Q:7 C:6 R:8 S:10

⭐ Mac Mini M4 16GB top pick! NVIDIA fine-tune of Llama 3.1. Hybrid /think • /no_think mode — deep reasoning on demand, instant chat otherwise. ~80–120 tok/s on Apple Silicon Metal. 128K context. Apache 2.0.

chatlightspeedreasoning
#17

Qwen 3 (32B)

32B · 32GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:10 R:10 S:4

Near GPT-4 intelligence locally. Thinking mode demolishes hard problems. The local AI dream.

chatcodereasoningpowerqualitygeneral
#18

Kimi K2.5 (32B/1T MoE)

32B active (1T total MoE) · 32GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:10 R:10 S:4

Moonshot AI's agentic flagship. 1T total MoE parameters with 32B active per forward pass. Unmatched long-context reasoning at 256K tokens. Designed for complex agentic tasks and tool use. Model License — check moonshotai.com for commercial terms.

chatcodereasoningpowerquality

How this ranking works

LocalClaw ranks models using their tags plus relative benchmark scores for speed, quality, coding and reasoning. The goal is a practical local setup recommendation, not a synthetic leaderboard.