Use-case guide

Best local LLMs for RAG in 2026

Best local LLMs for retrieval-augmented generation, document Q&A, long-context summaries and private knowledge bases. Ranked from the LocalClaw model database with RAM requirements, quantization and links to static model pages.

Matching models
157
Best pick
Kimi K2 Instruct (1T MoE)
Primary signal
long-context, chat, reasoning, quality
SEO query
best local LLM for RAG

Quick answer

For rag, start with Kimi K2 Instruct (1T MoE) if your hardware fits it. If not, choose the highest-ranked model that fits your RAM tier and preferred quantization.

Top local models for rag

#1

Kimi K2 Instruct (1T MoE)

1T (32B active, 384 experts) · 1024GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:10 R:10 S:3

Moonshot AI trillion-parameter MoE flagship. 32B active params per token with 384 experts. Matches or beats GPT-4 Turbo on MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEval. Agentic & tool-use specialist. Server-grade only. Modified MIT.

chatcodereasoningqualitygeneral
#2

Qwen 3.5 MoE (122B/10B active)

122B (10B active) · 80GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:9 R:10 S:4

Large MoE model with only 10B active params. 60% cheaper to run than Qwen3-Max. 256K context. Top-tier reasoning, coding and multilingual. Hybrid think/non-think. Apache 2.0.

chatcodereasoningqualitypower
#3

Qwen 3.5 MoE (397B/17B active)

397B (17B active) · 256GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:10 R:10 S:2

Flagship open-source Qwen 3.5. Only 17B active params despite 397B total — world-class quality at MoE efficiency. Matches GPT-4o on major benchmarks. Requires multi-GPU or server-grade hardware. Apache 2.0.

chatcodereasoningquality
#4

Llama 4 Maverick (17B/400B MoE)

400B (17B active, 128 experts) · 384GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:10 R:10 S:2

Meta Llama 4 Maverick — 128-expert MoE flagship. Matches or beats GPT-4o and Gemini 2.0 Flash on reasoning, coding and multimodal benchmarks. 1M-token context. Server-grade hardware only. Llama 4 Community License.

chatvisionreasoningmultimodalquality
#5

Kimi K2 Thinking (1T MoE)

1T (32B active, 384 experts) · 1024GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:10 R:10 S:2

Moonshot AI K2 with extended reasoning mode. Chain-of-thought traces before final answer. Top-5 on GPQA, AIME, SWE-bench. Requires datacenter-grade hardware or distributed inference. Modified MIT.

reasoningcodequality
#6

DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T MoE)

1.6T (49B active) · 1024GB RAM · FP4/FP8 · Q:10 C:10 R:10 S:2

DeepSeek frontier MoE with 1M-token context, hybrid compressed attention and top-tier coding/reasoning. MIT licensed. Datacenter-grade only.

chatcodereasoningqualityagenticlong-context
#7

GLM-5.1

754B MoE · 640GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:10 R:10 S:2

Z.ai next-generation flagship for agentic engineering. Stronger coding, long-horizon tool use, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench and repo generation. MIT licensed.

chatcodereasoningqualityagenticgeneral
#8

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp (671B MoE)

671B (37B active) · 512GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:10 R:10 S:2

Experimental V3.2 with DeepSeek Sparse Attention (DSA) — halves inference cost vs V3.1 on long context while keeping quality. 128K context, improved coding & tool-use. MIT licensed. Server-grade.

chatcodereasoningquality
#9

GLM 4.6 (355B MoE)

355B (32B active) · 320GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:10 R:10 S:2

Zhipu AI flagship — full GLM 4.6. 200K context, strong tool-calling & agentic workflows. Competes with Claude 3.5 Sonnet on reasoning and code. MIT licensed. Server-grade hardware.

chatcodereasoningqualitygeneral
#10

DeepSeek R1 0528 (671B MoE)

671B (37B active) · 512GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:10 R:10 S:1

Updated flagship DeepSeek R1 with improved reasoning chains and fewer hallucinations. Major upgrade to chain-of-thought quality. MIT licensed. Server-grade only.

reasoningcodequality
#11

Command A (111B)

111B · 96GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:9 R:10 S:2

Cohere open-weight flagship optimised for agentic workflows and long-context RAG. 256K context, excellent multilingual coverage (23 languages). CC-BY-NC 4.0 — non-commercial.

chatreasoningqualitygeneralpower
#12

MiMo-V2.5-Pro (1.02T MoE)

1.02T (42B active) · 1024GB RAM · FP8 · Q:10 C:9 R:10 S:2

Xiaomi MiMo flagship MoE for demanding agentic, software engineering and long-horizon tasks. 1M-token context, FP8, strong instruction following. MIT licensed.

chatcodereasoningqualityagenticlong-context
#13

Hermes 4 (405B)

405B · 384GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:9 R:10 S:1

Nous Research flagship 405B with hybrid thinking. Matches Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o on reasoning benchmarks. Server-grade hardware only. Llama 3.1 Community License.

chatreasoningqualitygeneral
#14

Qwen 3 (32B)

32B · 32GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:10 R:10 S:4

Near GPT-4 intelligence locally. Thinking mode demolishes hard problems. The local AI dream.

chatcodereasoningpowerqualitygeneral
#15

Kimi K2.5 (32B/1T MoE)

32B active (1T total MoE) · 32GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:10 R:10 S:4

Moonshot AI's agentic flagship. 1T total MoE parameters with 32B active per forward pass. Unmatched long-context reasoning at 256K tokens. Designed for complex agentic tasks and tool use. Model License — check moonshotai.com for commercial terms.

chatcodereasoningpowerquality
#16

Qwen 3.6 (27B)

27B · 32GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:9 C:9 R:10 S:5

Qwen 3.6 flagship dense model. Hybrid thinking mode with /think toggle for deep chain-of-thought reasoning. 128K context, 29+ languages. Significantly outperforms Qwen3.5-27B on reasoning, coding & math. Apache 2.0.

chatcodereasoningpowerquality
#17

DeepSeek V3.2 (37B/671B MoE)

37B (671B MoE) · 48GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:10 R:10 S:3

DeepSeek's massive MoE flagship. 37B active out of 671B total. Exceptional coding, reasoning and general capabilities. Ranks #6 on global usage leaderboards with 29B monthly tokens. MIT licensed.

chatcodereasoningpowerqualitygeneral
#18

Trinity Large Preview (70B MoE)

70B (MoE, ~400B total) · 48GB RAM · Q4_K_M · Q:10 C:10 R:10 S:3

Arcee AI's massive MoE open model. ~400B total parameters, 70B active per forward pass. Ranks near the top of global usage leaderboards. Exceptional versatility across reasoning, coding and chat. Free and open-source. Apache 2.0.

chatcodereasoningpowerqualitygeneral

How this ranking works

LocalClaw ranks models using their tags plus relative benchmark scores for speed, quality, coding and reasoning. The goal is a practical local setup recommendation, not a synthetic leaderboard.